Re: Why is the iPhone so inefficient compared to Android?

On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 16:28:23 +0000, Tyrone wrote :

One claim he makes IS supported by facts.

The problem with you religious zealots is you don't know any facts.

I have to teach you everything about Apple that you don't know.
Which is everything.

To wit:
 <https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en#energy-label>

FACT: *Almost every OEM earned an A in at least one model*
                   *Except Apple*

Why can't any iPhone ever earn an A on efficiency when Apple marketing has
spent millions of dollars touting their supposed "efficiency" for decades?
 <https://regulatoryinfo.apple.com/cwt/api/ext/file?fileId=whitePaperEnergyLabels/EU_Energy_Label_for_iPhone_and_iPad_EN_1749628569689.pdf>

Hint: Apple lied.
      The proof is not a single iPhone can earn an A on efficiency.
      Yet almost every Android OEM sold in Europe was able to do it.

1. Go to the EPREL database: <https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/>
2. Select the product category: "Smartphones and tablets"
   <https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669>
3. Search by brand, e.g., Google, Apple, Samsung, etc.

FACTS:
 The Apple A3287 iPhone 16 rating is "B" (with B being worse than A).
 The ASUS ASUSAI2501H rating is "A" (with A being the best).
 The Fairphone Gen.6 FP6 rating is "A" (with A being the best).
 The Google GUR25 Pixel rating is "A" (with A being the best).
 The Honor DNP-NX9 rating is "A" (with A being the best).
 The Motorola g86 5G (XT2527-2) rating is "A" (with A being the best).
 The Nokia HMD TA-1600 rating is "A" (with A being the best).
 The Nothing CMF A001 rating is "A" (with A being the best).
 The Oppo CPH2695 rating is "A" (with A being the best).
 The Samsung SM-S937B/DS S24 rating is "A" (with A being the best).
 The Xiaomi 24129PN74G rating is "A" (with A being the best).