Re: Why ARE Android phones such power sucking junk? (was: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sm advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Why ARE Android phones such power sucking junk? (was: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?)
De : none (at) *nospam* none.none (Tyrone)
Groupes : comp.sys.mac.advocacy misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Date : 04. Jul 2025, 14:26:30
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <jM-dnbCnh48bS_r1nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@supernews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Usenapp for MacOS
On Jul 4, 2025 at 4:33:36 AM EDT, "Marion" <marion@facts.com> wrote:

Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669
 Enter "Samsung" in the "Brand or trademark" field.
 Battery endurance per cycle
  SM-S937B/DS 40h 05min
  SM-X210R 98h 32min
  SM-X216R 55h 14min
  SM-G766B 38h 15min
  SM-X350 142h 50min
  SM-X356B 142h 50min
  SM-X526E 96h 32min
  SM-X620 99h 06min
  SM-X520 96h 32min
  SM-X626B 99h 06min
  SM-X526B 96h 32min
  SM-A266B/DS 37h 05min
  SM-A566B/DS 44h 34min
  SM-A366B/DS 41h 28min
  SM-S936B/DS 43h 38min
  SM-S938B/DS 44h 54min
  SM-A165F/DSB 45h 10min
  SM-A166B/DS 43h 30min
  SM-X820 73h 44min
  SM-X920 85h 18min
  SM-X826B 73h 44min
  SM-X926B 85h 18min
  SM-S721B/DS 42h 00min
  SM-G556B 41h 22min
  SM-S921B/DS 41h 26min
  SM-X300 62h 31min
  SM-X306B 62h 31min
 
  Total hours: 2,056.96
  Average = Total / 28 models = 2,056.96 ÷ 28 ˜ 73.46 hours
 
Go to https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669
 Enter "Apple" in the "Brand or trademark" field.
  A3267 62h 00min
  A3268 72h 00min
  A3355 67h 00min
  A3269 72h 00min
  A3354 67h 00min
  A3266 62h 00min
  A3409 41h 00min
  A2993 67h 00min
  A2995 67h 00min
  A3293 37h 00min
  A3290 48h 00min
  A3296 48h 00min
  A3287 37h 00min
  A2836 73h 00min
  A2837 73h 00min
  A2925 77h 00min
  A2926 77h 00min
  A3090 34h 00min
  A3094 45h 00min
 
  Total battery hours = 1,199 hours
  Average per model = 1,199 ÷ 19 ˜ 63.1 hours
 
Overall, Samsung models, based on EPREL data, have a 10 hour advantage.
That's a whopping ~16% higher average battery endurance per cycle.
 
Where is the fabled endurance that Apple marketing so highly touted?
Could it possibly be that Apple marketing cherry picked the results?

Oh look. Arlen is cherry picking the results. AGAIN. Those numbers include
tablets. Filter on phones only, and you get a much different story.

Samsung has 13 phones, 539.91 total hours = 41:32 average.  Apple has 7
phones, 290 total hours = 41:26 average.  Basically identical. 6 minutes
difference.

BUT, Apple is doing this on SMALLER BATTERIES than Samsung. Which means
iPhones are lighter, more portable and MORE EFFICIENT.

Why ARE Android phones such power sucking junk?  Are they running Intel space
heaters and using fans to keep cool?

If the iPhone 16 Pro Max had a 6000 mAh battery, it would run for more than 22
hours.  3 to 4 hours longer than any Android phone with a 6000 mAh battery.
For these facts, see the thread "iPhone 17 Pro Max Battery Capacity Leaked".
Which Arlen started and then abandoned because the facts got in the way of his
absurd-claim-of-the-day.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jul09:33 * Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?4Marion
4 Jul14:26 `* Re: Why ARE Android phones such power sucking junk? (was: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?)3Tyrone
4 Jul16:30  +- Re: Why ARE Android phones such power sucking junk?1Alan
4 Jul18:43  `- Re: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?1Marion

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal