Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

It matters that Apple is secondary in the industry.

>
So it's about bragging rights again.

 
"Bragging rights" that engender superior products, namely Winblows
over macOS.

>
LOL!

You laugh but it's self-evident.  As ridiculous as Wintendo OS is, it
does an amazing job of being what it is.  High-end PCs can benefit
from M$'s tinkering.

They depend on
Microsoft and Adobe to develop applications.

>
Apple makes computers and other computing devices and the operating
systems for those devices along with many applications to run on them.

 
Microsoft is more full-service.

>
Again... ...to the END USER, how does that matter?
>
What matters is that the END USER can find the software he or she needs
to get his or her tasks done.
>
And for almost every ordinary task, that software (often the exact same
software) is available for macOS.

Simple people like simple things, I suppose.

I actually enjoyed
seeing the free trial of M$ Office for Mac.  Showed it to my mom,
who's always used Office for Winblows.  The Mac version of Office is
actually great software.  And I imagine Adobe's stuff is pretty great
on it, and the movie editing, etc.  But for a typical PC user, posting
on Usenet everyday, macOS is a quirky choice.

Again with the "quirky".

 
Yep, wear it.

>
Not until you define it.

It's self-evident, Apple supplies a quirky corner of the market.

I support computer users for a living, and what I can tell you is that
while I technically have quite a few clients who use Macs, I almost
never see them anymore.
>
Because their Macs work that well.

 
 
Well, I support my own computer.

>
Bully for you.
>
Most people who run Windows cannot.
>
Where most Mac users rarely NEED support...
>
...because they just work.

Why don't they grow enough of a brain to teach themselves something?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.