Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it.

On 2024-12-11 14:24, Joel wrote:

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
 

High-end PCs can benefit
from M$'s tinkering [to make Windows 11 just right].

>
Give an example.

>
Well, boot Win11 24H2 on a nice 13th gen i7, and you have a great
experience.  That's what Microsoft supports.  Linux is the solution
for others, but they often overlook it.

>
In what way is booting that a better experience than booting macOS
Sequoia 15.1.1 on an M3 Mac?
>
Be specific (for once).

  macOS just isn't something suitable for the norm, but to people caught
in Apple land it seems to be.

You made a specific claim.
Back it up or shut up.

 

They depend on
Microsoft and Adobe to develop applications.

>
Apple makes computers and other computing devices and the operating
systems for those devices along with many applications to run on them.

>
Microsoft is more full-service.

>
Again... ...to the END USER, how does that matter?
>
What matters is that the END USER can find the software he or she needs
to get his or her tasks done.
>
And for almost every ordinary task, that software (often the exact same
software) is available for macOS.

>
Simple people like simple things, I suppose.

>
What's a complex thing that can't be done on a Mac?

>
Nothing.

>
So you have no actual answer.
>
You can't produce a single example of a complex thing that can't be done
on a Mac.
>
Got it.

  It was acknowledgement of your point.  macOS has every capability that
WinNT and Linux have.

So then your insult was just bigotry...
...right?

 

I actually enjoyed
seeing the free trial of M$ Office for Mac.  Showed it to my mom,
who's always used Office for Winblows.  The Mac version of Office is
actually great software.  And I imagine Adobe's stuff is pretty great
on it, and the movie editing, etc.  But for a typical PC user, posting
on Usenet everyday, macOS is a quirky choice.

Again with the "quirky".

>
Yep, wear it.

>
Not until you define it.

>
It's self-evident, Apple supplies a quirky corner of the market.

>
That's another non-answer.

>
I was blown away by Finder.  Really amusing, how little effort Apple's
programmers put in.

>
As opposed to what?

  Windows, several Linux file programs.

 > >

What specifically do you not like about the Finder?

  It's just basic and clunky, or was in ...

IN WHAT WAY?
What is a specific thing that the Windows and/or Linux file programs do that the Finder does not do?

 

And how out-of-date is your experience of it; Snow Leopard?

  Very little since.
 

So your whole claim is bullshit, then.
Got it.