Re: Qualcomm 5G Modem Versus Apple C1 Modem ─ Qualcomm Wins on Both Speed and Thermals

On 2025-05-28 09:01, Marion wrote:

On 28 May 2025 15:13:28 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :
 

'A test run by Cellular Insights and PAID FOR BY Qualcomm'

>
LOL

 Given Apple has never made a best-in-class chip in their history,
what makes these Apple trolls so confident to 'diss Qualcomm, who has?

All of Apple's "A" series chips are widely acknowledged as best-in-class.

 a. Apple's C1 modem has no mmWave 5G
b. Wi-Fi 6 Only (i.e., the C1 has no Wi-Fi 7)

And you demonstrate your ignorance again.
The C1 modem isn't responsible for WiFi connectivity at all...
...which is the same for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X75 5G it was tested against.
<https://www.qualcomm.com/products/technology/modems/snapdragon-x75-5g-modem-rf-system#blockdiagram>

c. Fewer downlink carrier aggregation bands
d. No Uplink Carrier Aggregation and Uplink MIMO
e. Low performance under stress of urban environments
f. Already has a baseband flaw
    <https://cyberscoop.com/apple-security-update-c1-modem-privacy-fixes-may-2025/>
 In summary, the way Apple's (rather brilliantly unapologetic) Marketing
puts it, the Apple C1 can't do much, but it's efficient at doing nothing.
 HINT: An Apple SOC with unpatchable flaws, is NOT best in class, no matter
how desperate you Apple trolls are to claim Apple's SOCs are not garbage.

HINT: nothing you have referenced claims an "unpatchable flaw" in anything.

 If you can find even a SINGLE Apple best-in-class chip, let us all know.
We've been waiting for a loooooong time for Apple's design teams to do it.

Hey! Do you remember when you used to insist that Apple didn't actually do any design?
:-)