Liste des Groupes | Revenir à pm iphone |
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 21:35:22 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :
You've made no maths argument. Come back with a fully formulated equation.
Your claim is mathematically absurd.
I have made no claim. That might be why.
Apple doesn't have their own proprietary laws of physics/chemistry.
Apple doesn't have their own proprietary laws of physics/chemistry.
Everyone knows that two devices which use equal amounts of power,
Not necessarily.
Despite your claim that math doesn't work with Apple products, it does.
will reach the 80%
degradation point from charge cycles at vastly different times (in years).
Your claim that they don't is simply preposterously absurd.
I have made no such claim.
Then you agree that battery capacity will be the biggest determinant of the
life of a mobile device given comparison of two devices of equal output.
Specifically, you claim that Apple has special physics known only to them.
I have made no such claim. Why are you lying?
If you don't accept the math Chris,
What you don't understand, Chris, is math. Arithmetic in particular.
Given two devices with essentially equal power consumption, the device with
twice the battery capacity will reach the 80% charge-cycle degradation
point well before the device with double that battery capacity.
This is basic physics, Chris.
For you to deny basic physics means you claim Apple has "special" physics.
I simply explained to you the EU regulations that you seem so fond of have
no bearing on your absurd obsession on battery capacities.
You think the EU makes up these rules just for the fun of it, Chris?
You think almost no iPhone meets the bare minimum by accident, Chris?
You think Apple changing the calculations on the iPhone 15 are also by
accident Chris? Or that only the iPhone 15 and up barely meets the EU
minimum spec is by accident, Chris?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.