Re: Where is the efficiency Apple has claimed for years for the iPhone?

On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 20:33:22 +0000, Tyrone wrote :

Q: Where is the efficiency Apple has claimed for years for the iPhone?

 
Same as always. Getting better runtimes with smaller batteries than most
Android junk. You KNOW this is true.  Everyone here KNOWS this is true. It has
been proven here. YOU HELPED TO PROVE IT.

The fact remains that almost every major OEM phone maker scored at least
one "A" on efficiency in the new June 20th 2025 phone efficiency ratings.
 <https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669>

Except Apple.
 *What we learned from the iPhone energy labels Apple was forced to add*
  <https://bgr.com/tech/8-things-we-learned-from-the-iphone-energy-labels-apple-was-forced-to-add-in-europe/>

After years of claiming efficiency, we find out the iPhone isn't efficient.
Apple lied.
Again.

The iPad is even worse.
Most scored a "G" (which is after "F", by the way).
Only one iPad did better than an "F".

Even my four-year old free Android has a better battery than in the iPhone.
 iPhone 16 Pro Max �V 4,685 mAh
 iPhone 16 Pro �V 3,582 mAh
 iPhone 16 Plus �V 4,674 mAh
 iPhone 16 �V 3,561 mAh
 iPhone 16e �V 4,005 mAh
 iPhone 15 Plus �V 4,383 mAh
 iPhone 15 �V 3,349 mAh

Recharge the phone every day, and you'll get about three years of use.
Which is a *lot* less than my free Android - which is still going strong.