Sujet : Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 03. Jun 2025, 22:45:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <o1ru3kl764qpqjn2g921laptlm89n6u571@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 21:31:05 -0000 (UTC), Beej Jorgensen <
beej@beej.us>
wrote:
In article <pnct3k1grlt8flup51ass2pgtactgkfnrd@4ax.com>,
Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
I believe that is the current "level of care."
>
That level of care requires judicial oversight that we are not currently
maintaining, so it's not the current level.
It's not required for illegals.
I haven't seen anyone sent to the Salvadorian prison who doesn't belong
there.
>
When it comes to the Constitution, what matters is what the courts have
seen, not what you or I have seen.
The SOTUS has cleared the way to deportations
What's the rush? You have the guy in custody--he's not a threat. Give
him a hearing. Maybe during the hearing you'll find that it was illegal
for you to deport him to El Salvador *before* you do it, and you can
deport him, legally, to a different country.
There are thousand of illegals. It would take years and $$$$$ to
process them all through the courts... and besides, it's not
necessary.
-- C'est bonSoloman