Sujet : Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!
De : john_nospam (at) *nospam* jhall.co.uk (John Hall)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwhoDate : 27. Jan 2025, 10:50:09
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <sXMIBiARb1lnFw6X@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Turnpike/6.07-M (<8zSUhDE0FYcICU863VwPHi49yo>)
In message <
vn6cpu$6jeo$1@dont-email.me>, Your Name <
YourName@YourISP.com> writes
<snip>
There is no discussion. Doctor Who definitely can belong in rec.arts.sf.tv and rec.arts.tv and rec.arts.tv.uk.misc among a few other newsgroups.
rec.arts.sf.tv certainly. I think the other two groups would be pushing things, since the great majority of their readers are unlikely to have watched or be interested in the show. (More fool them, I agree, but their wishes should be respected.)
-- John Hall "I look upon it, that he who does not mind his belly, will hardly mind anything else." Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-84)
Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!
Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!