Liste des Groupes | Revenir à a drwho |
The True Doctor wrote on 28/12/24 11:08 am:Even a 4 year old child understands gravity better than Steven Moffat.On 26/12/2024 15:40, Hornplayer9599 wrote:Are you regressing, Aggy?? I mean you used to post that it was writtenOn 12/26/2024 09:04, Blueshirt wrote:>Festive fun with the 15th Doctor...and plenty of schmaltz.>
>
"Joy to the World" is probably one of the 15th Doctor's
strongest stories (so far) in terms of the actual story, with
Ncuti's performance being just right for this heart-warming
festive episode.
Yes this was, on the whole, a solid story. That being said, I'm not
Solid in like leaking like a sieve as if it were written by a 4 year old child that thinks a sieve being made of solid materials can hold water.
by a six year old .... now you are suggesting a four year old
Script-writter!!
They teach you the basic laws of physics at school. Time travel is only possible forwards in time. Doing that is easy since we do it every day and while travelling at high speed or experiencing high gravity causes it to happen faster. Travel backwards in time is shown to be impossible in quantum field theory and only possible in general relativity in a universe that contains or in which you can create closed time loops which is not the one in which we live in. Travelling sideways in time, ie. by tunnelling to another parallel universe might be possible but you'd require more energy than this universe contains in order to do it and you'd end up killing yourself in the process of going through a wormhole, unless you can create some sort of teleportation mechanism that doesn't dismantle the whole of your body piece by piece.How well do you know 'the basic laws of physics', Aggy?? Do they reallyexpecting the best Who stories to take place during the Christmas episodes...but this was a good one.>
The least you can expect is for them to adhere to the basic laws of physics
cover Time Travel, ah la 'Doctor Who'??
<Snip>What for? As a weapon? You've already got enough energy to wipe out the entire universe if you can travel backwards in time.
The entre premise of a Time Hotel undermines the entire plot sinceBecause you can, maybe!!
if you have enough energy to permit time travel why do you need to
make a new star?
Earth did have time travel technology of its own in the year four thousand and something.Why doesn't Villenguard have time travel technology of its own?Why doesn't Earth have Time Travel Technology of its own??
<Snip>
I know that he is a pervert and how to spot them.Then he'd be a bigger pervert than he is already.And Aggy knows everything Pervert related!!
<Snip>We know now that RTD and Moffat are sick perverts. RTD being homosexual is incapable (based on his own statements) of believable writing heterosexual relationships as with saw with Rose and the 9th/10th Doctor. Moffat can only write heterosexual relationships where the man is depicted as a wimp and emasculate, and therefore these relationships are not believable either but not as unbelievable as RTDs relationships. We know that both of them are perverts as is Chris Chibnall who has an alien frog entice a human being into having sex with it by impersonating his wife. These woke imbeciles don't have a clue about morality. Look at Wonder Woman 1984 where they has Gal Gadot rape a man whose body she took over by implanting the consciousness of her decease boyfriend Steve Trevor into it and suppressing that of the bodies original owner. That's equivalent to spiking people's drinks with date rape drugs.
How old is he again? 2000? 3000? How old was she? How can a relationship with such an age gap be appropriate? Does he see her like a human would see a pet hamster?Gee Whiz!! And this would be the first time The Doctor has had the HOTS
for one of the companions, wouldn't it?? (Rose + 10th Doctor, anyone??
Amy + 11th Doctor??)
So Moffat is contradicting Davies' continuity then. Couldn't he have erased the Timeless Child monster from canon instead?Well, as The Doctor (9 or 10, was it??) HAS been to the End of The sun,Yeah, 7/10 is a good call. Some of the *minor* things I would>
also mention is that they got the year wrong at the end (0001)...and...like
You think it should have been 6 or 4 BC instead?
>
Why only 4 digits? Are they insinuating that the world ends before they year 9999?
which would also have been the end of The Earth!!)
Did you mean the lack of use of AD?Or are they just trying to avoid AD to be racist to Christians?How is the use of 'AD' racist to Christians, Aggy, when it literally
stands for AD .... abbreviation for Anno Domini : a Latin phrase meaningSo why did Moffat not say 0001 AD instead of just the year 0001?
"in the year of the Lord", which is used when referring to a year after
Jesus Christ was born:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/adThe idea of the show is to educate the viewers. Instead it's being hijacked to encourage viewers to commit suicide if their parents die and to allow their children to be abused by adults, especially ones who are much older.Why didn't the retards just use the Roman year instead? The 754th of the foundation of Rome?.... because the VAST majority of the population (which YOU claim they
have chased away) would not understand the difference!!
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.