Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à a drwho 
Sujet : Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!
De : YourName (at) *nospam* YourISP.com (Your Name)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv
Date : 11. Jan 2025, 07:25:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlt2se$ghio$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-01-10 22:55:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
On 2025-01-10 15:44:59 +0000, Blueshirt said:
 Colin Baker had no chance. A great actor seriously let-down
by everything around him.
 Colin Baker was pretty bad, but then so was his successor
Sylvester McCoy with his Poirot-ised version of the Doctor.
 Well there's something I have never heard said before. The
Seventh Doctor like Hercule Poirot! Captain Hastings would have
a heart attack if he read that!
 I can't say that I see it myself...
I should probably have said a (then) modern day Poirot. Sylvester McCoy is a funny little man who swaggered around using that umbrella like a walking stick ... all that was missing was the twee little mustache and the Belgian accent.  :-)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Jan 25 * Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!11Your Name
11 Jan 25 `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!10Your Name
26 Jan 25  `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!9Daniel70
26 Jan 25   +- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Daniel70
26 Jan 25   +- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Your Name
27 Jan 25   `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!6Daniel70
27 Jan 25    +* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!2solar penguin
28 Jan 25    i`- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Daniel70
27 Jan 25    `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!3John Hall
27 Jan 25     +- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Your Name
28 Jan 25     `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Daniel70

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal