Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à a drwho 
Sujet : Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* eternal-september.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Date : 29. Jan 2025, 13:44:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vnd7qr$2cmec$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall  <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$1@dont-email.me>, Your Name
<YourName@YourISP.com> writes
<Snip>

If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor Who (or
whatever show) posted there, then that's their problem. I don't like
90% of the shows they post about either, but they're certainly allowed
to post about them and they are far more on topic than all the silly
political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
>
>
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
 Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for ALL T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
--
Daniel70

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jan 25 * Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!15Your Name
27 Jan 25 `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!14John Hall
27 Jan 25  `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!13Your Name
28 Jan 25   `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!12John Hall
29 Jan 25    `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!11Daniel70
29 Jan 25     +* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!8Your Name
29 Jan 25     i`* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!7%
29 Jan 25     i +* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!5%
30 Jan 25     i i+* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!3%
30 Jan 25     i ii`* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!2%
30 Jan 25     i ii `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Daniel70
30 Jan 25     i i`- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Daniel70
30 Jan 25     i `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1%
30 Jan 25     `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!2Daniel70
30 Jan 25      `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Your Name

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal