Re: Mickey the idiot

Blueshirt brilliantly brought forth:

The True Doctor wrote:
 

On 01/02/2025 13:31, Blueshirt wrote:

 
I'd still find it unlikely that all of the 32 women's stories
are made up. But even if The Guardian does lose the case, I
doubt they will go bust.

 
It is not just likely but an absolute fact as determined by
the police that all of these women made it all up since the
police did not have enough evidence against Clarke to even
warrant an investigation let alone charge him with a crime.

 
That's not how it works, not having enough evidence to prosecute
doesn't mean 'something' didn't happen.
 
If I whip my cock out in my office and shove it in a woman's
face and say "suck this if you want a job" and she runs out of
the room and goes to the police, if there's no witnesses, CCTV
footage or sound footage to back up her claims, then there will
be no evidence for a prosecution. He said, she said.
 
But I would still have done it!
 

Noel Clark is completely innocent of any crime. Because of
this he is taking the Guardian to court for defamation.

 
Which he might win, or he might lose... he certainly hasn't got
off to a great start anyway if that article is correct.
 
Judge AGA cannot say that Noel Clarke is completely innocent
though, just as I can't say that he's guilty, as neither of us
where there when any of these 'incidents' happened.
 
 

It’s interesting how Aggy repeatedly accuses RTD of being a
sexual predator on zero evidence, but demands proof for
the accusations against Noel Clarke.

Double standards?  Why am I not surprised?

--
solar penguin