Sujet : Re: Mickey the idiot
De : solar.penguin (at) *nospam* gmail.com (solar penguin)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 03. Feb 2025, 14:07:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vnqf1k$19a8f$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
The True loon lost it again:
On 02/02/2025 14:11, solar penguin wrote:
You forgot to change it to ‘solar imbecile’ again. Please try harder.
It’s interesting how Aggy repeatedly accuses RTD of being a
sexual predator on zero evidence, but demands proof for
the accusations against Noel Clarke.
There's plenty of evidence against RTD. It's in almost everything he
makes. He's even admitted it himself when he said that he gets thrilled
every time someone tells him that he discovered as a boy that he was gay
after watching something Davies wrote or produced.
Even if that’s true, it’s still not enough for the police to charge
him with anything, which is your standard for claiming Clarke
innocent.
Like I said, double standards.
Double standards? Why am I not surprised?
The only double standards are those of the woke.
Why was John Barrowman cancelled for showing his cock on set on Doctor
Who, which was part of his job description, when it was the pervert RTD
who told him to strip naked on order to film a scene where he pulled a
gun out of his arse in a children's TV programme? Why wasn't Davies
cancelled as well? Why did the pervert Chris Chibnall ask Barrowman to
strip naked on Torchwood? Why wasn't Chibnall also cancelled?
Which is all irrelevant to whether or not Clarke did anything wrong?
(I assume you aren’t seriously suggesting Barrowman’s guilt
somehow proves Clarke’s innocence as if it’s only possible for
just one companion to be played by a sex pest!)
-- solar penguin