Sujet : Re: Ratings Asphyxiation for Doctor Whoke
De : pursent100 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (%)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 14. Jun 2024, 20:21:46
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <zq2cnY43S5TWBfH7nZ2dnZfqn_YAAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Blueshirt wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-06-13 6:47 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>
I can see him moving the goalposts on that Wikipedia
entry. Remember, for Aggy Wikipedia is a worthless,
unreliable information source....unless the information in
question supports his position....then you can consider it
gospel. That's what listening to him for over 20 years
can provide for you.
>
Forget Wikipedia, was it on YouTube though? If Disparu or
Nerdrotic didn't mention any female renaissance painters in
one of their videos then clearly there's no such thing.
>
Never thought of YouTube and still won't, but it's fun showing
Aggy that he is wrong (again),
It's one thing to have an opinion, but Aggy just can't seem to
handle other people might have a different opinion.
even though he resides in my bozo bin it's still fun.
Are you not worried about your computer blowing up? ;-)
he doesn't have a computer he just has a killfile