Sujet : Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who - Logopolis
De : pfeiffer (at) *nospam* cs.nmsu.edu (Joe Pfeiffer)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv rec.arts.tv can.arts.sfDate : 08. Jul 2024, 03:15:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1bo778aati.fsf@pfeifferfamily.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) writes:
In article <1bjzhxx6g0.fsf@pfeifferfamily.net>,
Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote:
You can't imagine the level of my lack of interest in AI generated
"reviews"... One or two were amusing; we're past that now. Please stop.
>
>
i RATHER MAKE THE CASE HOW IMPERFECT ai IS.
The case has been made. The horse you're beating died long ago.
Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who - Logopolis
Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who - Logopolis