Sujet : Re: Cinema Ratings
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 08. Jul 2024, 12:53:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v6gjut$s0ji$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
The True Doctor wrote on 8/7/24 6:54 pm:
On 07/07/2024 22:48, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 7/7/24 2:19 am:
<Snip>
Do you understand that this is how the statistics are always all fiddled for publicity? The BBC have wasted licence fee payers' money and should be condemned for it.
No, I thought YOU, Aggy, were supplying us with all the Stats we
needed!!
If only Aggy did provide some proper stats! Or links to articles
If only the BBC and Disney+ would provide some proper stats. The onus
is on them since they have the stats not me.
And what would those "proper stats" look like, Aggy, according to YOU??
5 people attended?? 500 attended?? 25,000 attended??
And, just to be clear ATTENDED not Paid for attendance.
backing up his POV even... as opposed to guesses and made-up nonsense that he got from people he worships on YouTube, who [on
In the business of science those are called estimates, predictions,
and extrapolations.
I thought Science was big on Hypothesis, too
the whole] don't have a clue what they are talking about but love
stirring up controversy as that's what makes income for them for
their YouTube channels.
They have more of a clue of what they are talking about than you,
Why is that, Aggy?? Because they are getting PAID, perhaps.
and understand literature and the principles of good story telling
and story writing better than you do too.
-- Daniel