Sujet : Re: Cinema Ratings
De : agamemnon (at) *nospam* hello.to.NO_SPAM (The True Doctor)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 09. Jul 2024, 03:35:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v6i7kr$17pbg$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 08/07/2024 13:00, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 8/7/24 6:54 pm:
On 07/07/2024 22:48, Blueshirt wrote:
>
If only Aggy did provide some proper stats! Or links to
articles
>
If only the BBC and Disney+ would provide some proper stats.
The onus is on them since they have the stats not me.
>
And what would those "proper stats" look like, Aggy, according
to YOU?? 5 people attended?? 500 attended?? 25,000 attended??
BARB provide stats, but Aggy doesn't believe them. He will
believe nothing that doesn't support HIS narrative.
BARB provide stats to the broadcasters which are biased to the way the broadcasters want the public and advertisers to perceive their narrative. They are not true statistics and they purposefully do not give the audience, public and creators the information that they actually want or which contradicts the broadcasters' own narratives.
Plus, the stats that BARB do publish are stats based on people
who only watched Doctor Who for ten seconds, like they do his
gaming YouTube channel.
What the public and creators want is not the total number of people who watched for 10 second or more. What they want is the total number of people who watched a programme from start to finish all the way through.
Why don't the broadcasters want us to know those figures?
I've provided you a way to approximate them. Divide what BARB claims by 100 and that is closer to the mark, the number of people who watched a show all the way through. As a creator this is the figure I want to know, not the number of clicks for 10 second views which is advertiser shit.
And, just to be clear ATTENDED not Paid for attendance.
Don't encourage him, in his part of the special hospital where
he resides, nobody paid anything for cinema tickets and nobody
attended the showings. It was all a big PR stunt by the BBC.
You are hallucinating your own fantasies and can't distinguish them from reality.
Officially not one single person needed to go to watch Doctor Who in the cinemas, since the theatre rooms were booked by the BBC in advance for a fixed fee. The BBC can claim that the rooms were all full if it likes, and that is what it has done, even if they were all empty, since they've already paid for all the seats. This is what is known as a scam and a lie. Anyone can hire a venue and claim they filled it even if nobody attended the event the venue was booked for.
It doesn't matter how many tickets the BBC sold, the rooms sill count as full houses even if they're completely empty, just like a night club counts as a full house even if it's empty because it has to pay royalties to the PRS/PPL/MCPS for all music played as if it had a full house. Those are the figures the BBC are declaring. Lies based on numbers that they have to pay actors money for royalties and residuals.
The reality is that all but a tiny number of the seats were occupied. Let the BBC prove otherwise.
Nobody is watching Doctor Who.
Doctor Who finished in 2017.
-- The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." -William Shatner