Sujet : Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who - Logopolis
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwhoDate : 09. Jul 2024, 12:18:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v6j6an$1c3de$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
The Doctor wrote on 8/7/24 11:12 pm:
In article <v6gksq$s4vd$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Joe Pfeiffer wrote on 8/7/24 12:15 pm:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) writes:
In article <1bjzhxx6g0.fsf@pfeifferfamily.net>, Joe Pfeiffer
<pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote:
You can't imagine the level of my lack of interest in AI
generated "reviews"... One or two were amusing; we're past that
now. Please stop.
>
>
i RATHER MAKE THE CASE HOW IMPERFECT ai IS.
>
The case has been made. The horse you're beating died long ago.
>
... but, Joe, you must realise by now that 'The Doctor' is a bit SLOW!!
You certainly wouldn't want him as your Doctor!!
And you will forgot what you did the next day.
NO, Gobble-de-gook, no-one can forget what they will do the next day ... BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T DONE WHAT THEY'LL DO THE NEXT DAY, *YET* , Gobble-de-gook!!
-- Daniel