Sujet : Re: ChatGPt reviews Doctor Who - Warriors of the Deep
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 21. Jul 2024, 11:23:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v7inj2$23pq$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
The Doctor wrote on 21/7/24 12:45 am:
In article <v7gena$3i933$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 20/7/24 7:05 am:
Dave-GPT wrote:
>
Overall Rating and Final Thoughts
>
"Warriors of the Deep" is a compelling story that revisits
classic foes and explores themes of war, mistrust, and the
cost of conflict. The underwater setting of Sea Base 4 adds a
unique and atmospheric backdrop to the narrative. Here are the
individual and overall ratings:
>
Part One: 7.5/10
Part Two: 7/10
Part Three: 7.5/10
Part Four: 8/10
>
Overall Rating: 7.5/10
>
That could only be an AI generated review anyway, as no normal
person would rate "Warriors of the Deep" that highly!
>
Correct! The clue was in the first word of the 'review' ... "Certainly'
... implying that there were two identities involved in the production
of the review ....
>
1. Gobble-de-gook issued some 'instructions, and,
>
2. The AI entity produced what Gobble-de-gook posted!!
>
But Gobble-de-gook is too DUMB to even edit "His" post BEFORE posting.
Why edit when you have to produce the said evidence?
BUT YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are NOT producing this garbage, Gobble-de-gook!!
You would not make a good police officer.
Good enough to identify that YOU, Gobble-de-gook, that YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are a thief for claiming YOU, Gobble-de-gook, produce this SHIT!!
-- Daniel