Sujet : Re: More Doctor Whoke material removed by BBC this time due to connection with child killer
De : YourName (at) *nospam* YourISP.com (Your Name)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 04. Aug 2024, 22:09:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v8oqlv$88l8$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-08-04 13:08:13 +0000, The Last Doctor said:
I The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <v8lr6n$3hi64$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
First a child molester and now a child killer have had their
contributions to Doctor Whoke removed by the BBC because of their
disgusting and despicable crimes.
https://deadline.com/2024/08/uk-stabbings-suspect-previously-appeared-doctor-who-charity-advert-now-removed-by-bbc-1236030784/ When will the sick woke perverts, retards, degenerates, and child
groomers running the show be removed? Anyone with any sense would
realize that you don't promote sexual agendas to children or to anyone.
Instead of protecting children and families BBC give respectability to
perverts and killers through their disgusting DEI initiatives.
Nothing equitable about this.
Thatâs right. Totally inequitable.
Aggie is being an ignorant stupid arsehole using his agenda driven
prejudices to accuse people of something they didnât do.
Who can possibly vet and exclude an 11 year old from a charity campaign
because six years later he will prove to be severely mentally unstable and
perform an atrocity on little girls? How are they supposed to know?
Children in Need didnât choose an 11 year old Welsh boy who wanted to dress
as the Doctor, because of any diversity and inclusion agenda. They probably
did it because he was a photogenic kid.
Itâs right to remove his footage from the archives - heâs definitely lost
the right to have positive images of him on-screen.
But neither the BBC, nor Children in Need, nor Moffatâs Doctor Who
production team did anything wrong at the time and to try to draw spurious
connections like this is insulting to people of even modest intelligence.
No one with even a smidgen of common sense would even think it. Even a
fascistic, misogynistic moron shouldnât ought to either, to be honest, but
clearly Iâm giving Aggie too much credit there.
Similarly, the BBC didnât hire Huw Edwards because of any diversity or
inclusion agenda, and not because they knew him to be a paedophile - they
didnât. And RTD didnât invite him to cameo on Doctor Who for those reasons
either.
No one at the time would have known about Edwardsâ secret proclivities. So
they canât be blamed for that or for using a respected news anchor in a
cameo.
The BBCâs behaviour over the last nine months has been questionable for
sure and they have questions to answer on that. But that has nothing to do
with the rightfully-to-be-re-edited âFear Herâ footage.
Edwards will no longer be a part of the heritage of Doctor Who, and quite
right too. Same as the execrable âA Fix With Sontaransâ. Dustbin of history
and good riddance.
Wrong! If you stupidly removed things about / created by people who did something "wrong" in their past and/or it upset some snowflake, you'd have absolutely nothing left in human history and nothing new could ever be made! Especially the way the Politically Correct morons keep changing the rules to suit whatever their current selfish agenda is.
Plus, by continually sweeping everything under the blanket with idiotic "cancel culture" nobody in the future will ever learn "right from wrong".