Re: stats 2024 1st half

The Doctor wrote:
 

In article <xn0op97cr2rukpv001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0op8v882bazpk000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

>
Google blocked access to Usenet from its servers in
February 2024, Dave OTOH decided that NotKnow would make
a stand against Google's tyranny and blocked them from
his servers last year. So any stats taken from the
NotKnow servers since then would not include any posts
from Google's servers.
>
That doesn't mean none were made though. Making his list
inaccurate and less relevant than they were before.

>
IYIO.

>
It is indeed my opinion, but any sensible person would agree
with me that a stats post that is compiled with [knowingly]
inaccurate information is a waste of time.

>
Show the inaccuracies.

 Well, if there are no posters from Google Groups included on
your list that means your list contains no Tim, no CCK and no
Roach, to name three... so how can a list be accurate if people
are missing from it numbnuts! Your stats list is not complete
therefore it is about as useful as a chocolate teapot.
 Did you ever have any common sense Dave or did you have an
accident when you were younger and get a bang on your head?