Re: Should we bring back RADWM?

The Doctor wrote on 13/8/24 1:00 am:

In article <xn0opheur2tc8j0003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

Truth Holder wrote:

<Snip>

but they weren't able to transfer the democratic values that
RADWM had.  When posts were rejected, people had a chance to
appeal it or ask for clarification, and if they didn't get a
response or thought the response was unreasonable there was a
meta forum where they could being it up to discuss with other
members and moderators.  Today's web-based forums don't have
anything like this at all, much less accountability for their
moderators like RADWM had.
>
I bet we could lure back some of the posters from those
hellscapes if had that kind of system again.

>
But if the configuration files for the original moderated
newsgroup are lost, what do you suggest? A 'new' RADWM v2.0
officially set-up and peered starting from scratch? How easy
would this be to actually achieve though?

 Not really.  We have to vote on new moderators for starters.
 

Oh!! Don't YOU, Gobble-de-gook, worry about it!! I very much doubt anybody here would vote YOU for Moderator .... knowing how busy YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are with YOUR High-Powered ISP Business!!
--
Daniel