Sujet : Re: Should we bring back RADWM?
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 13. Aug 2024, 02:47:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9edvq$3mi0p$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
The Doctor wrote on 13/8/24 12:58 am:
In article <xn0opheay2sjkwk000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 11/08/2024 12:58, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
>
No one ever posted in it.
>
Is that another way of saying none of your posts got past
moderation? ;-)
>
Its another way of saying that the group was always empty when
I looked to see if anyone had posted in it.
>
I'm not sure it was ever THAT empty... it certainly got less
traffic than RADW though.
>
Can't remember if I even posted there. Maybe just once.
Maybe not.
>
I posted there a good few times but I found the place rather
dull. Like a lot of moderated groups/forums.
>
I suppose with "Doctor Who" online discussions you expect some
sort of drama every now and again... and a group where everyone
is being nice doesn't really fit the bill!
Hence why it stays active.
Again, Gobble-de-gook, did YOU actually READ the post that YOU, Gobble-de-gook, responded to??
-- Daniel
Should we bring back RADWM?
Re: Should we bring back RADWM?
