Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who - Survival

In article <va18t8$38s4u$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

The Doctor wrote on 19/8/24 10:52 pm:

In article <v9v58q$2qu1g$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

The Doctor wrote on 18/8/24 10:27 pm:

In article <xn0opppj6awmiv001@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:
 

Here are the individual and overall ratings:
 - **Part One: 8/10** - **Part Two: 8.5/10** - **Part
Three: 9/10**
 **Overall Rating: 8.5/10**

 8.5? WTF?! <shocked face>
 They definitely have to be AI generated ratings anyway as
no sane person would rate any episodes of "Survival" that highly...
 

"Survival" is a well-crafted and thoughtful story,
offering a strong conclusion to the Seventh
Doctor’s era with a mix of action,
emotion, and introspection.

 As if.
 Survival was a load of bollocks!
 "Survival" brought the Sylvester McCoy era, and the
classic era of Doctor Who, to a fitting end. Like a badly
injured horse that needed putting out of its misery...
BANG!

 You sir are full of BS! I do agree with the rating, and your cut-and-lie leaves no discussion for plot review.
 

YOU, Gobble-de-gook, have already done a 'plot review',
haven't YOU, Gobble-de-gook .... and Blueshirt has cut that
part of YOUR review that he is not responding to, just as any
GOOD UseNeter SHOULD DO .... but, in any case, Gobble-de-gook,
YOUR COMPLETE 'review' is still all out there,
Gobble-de-gook!!
 If YOU, Gobble-de-gook, can't set YOUR UseNet Agent up
correctly, Gobble-de-gook, that's YOUR problem, Gobble-de-gook,
not ours!!

 Here's a review of "Doctor Who: Survival," based on the
transcript.

 See, YOU, Gobble-de-gook, can re-post something .... but it's STILL
NOT YOUR REVIEW, is it, Gobble-de-gook!!

 ChatGPT based in redaing the script from Survival.