Sujet : Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who - Survival
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 21. Aug 2024, 11:17:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <va4er1$3qsv5$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
The Doctor wrote on 21/8/24 6:30 am:
In article <xn0opsusa1q4gdb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 20/8/24 5:39 pm:
In article <va18t8$38s4u$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 19/8/24 10:52 pm:
>
Here's a review of "Doctor Who: Survival," based on the
transcript.
>
See, YOU, Gobble-de-gook, can re-post something .... but
it's STILL NOT YOUR REVIEW, is it, Gobble-de-gook!!
>
ChatGPT based in redaing the script from Survival.
>
"redaing"??
>
And Blueshirt was asking for YOUR wrote-up, Gobble-de-gook.
>
That's the thing, he can't do one... all Dave can do is post AI
generated text that's been copied and pasted. Those 'reviews'
might be on-topic for RADW but they are not his opinion of
those episodes... so therefore, they are a waste of time.
IYIO.
Yeap, and IMHO, as well, Gobble-de-gook!!
-- Daniel