Sujet : Re: Google Gemini reviews Doctor Who - Ghostlight
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.drwhoDate : 22. Sep 2024, 11:49:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vcosn6$26ahc$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
The Doctor wrote on 22/9/24 10:33 am:
In article <vcn71d$1nab9$1@dont-email.me>, Cryptoengineer
<petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/20/2024 11:21 PM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vckk1q$147qa$1@dont-email.me>, Tim Merrigan
<tppm@rr.ca.com> wrote:
On 9/19/2024 5:49 PM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vci18l$ms44$2@dont-email.me>, Tim Merrigan
<tppm@rr.ca.com> wrote:
On 9/18/2024 6:08 PM, The Doctor wrote:
So how can you tell a person from a machine?
Well, in this case, you tell us.
If a challenge a machine on its errors, am I a machine ir
human?
Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.
Many of those reviews start with "ChatGPT review of…". If
that isn't the poster telling us that it's an AI review, than
what is?
Than? Anyways, both ChatGPT and Google Gemini reviews are full
of errors! Can you spot them?
If they're full of errors, why even post them?
To prove how bad AI is.
You do realise, don't YOU, Gobble-de-gook, that these AI'thingees are supposed to be LEARNING as they go, Gobble-de-gook, so by posting all YOUR Crap, Gobble-de-gook, YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are supposedly making them SMARTER!!
-- Daniel