Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who - human Nature (10th Doctor)

Cryptoengineer wrote on 28/9/24 1:01 pm:

On 9/27/2024 5:45 PM, The Doctor wrote:

In article <20240927210334.146ec0b7f8286874108e9796@127.0.0.1>,
Kerr-Mudd, John <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:

On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:00:23 -0000 (UTC)
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>

Here’s a review of *Doctor Who: Human Nature*:
>

Did you not get the negative feedback earlier? Noboday AFAICT wants this.
Please cease, most especially in xposting to so many ngs.
>
FU to uk.media.tv.sf.drwho, as I guess that's where the OP
mostly posts to.
>
-- Bah, and indeed Humbug.

>
Can't think for yourself or cannot debate in public, Johhnyboy?

 Your response doesn't make sense. He expressed an opinion, which
seems to be universally held by everyone in this group except you,
that your AI generated garbage isn't worth posting.

Oh, no, you're wrong there.
Gobble-de-gook thinks AI is garbage, so he keeps posting his garbage so 'WE' can see just how garbage AI is.
--
Daniel