Sujet : Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who Victory of the Daleks
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 24. Oct 2024, 13:53:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vfdg0i$2krg5$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 9:58 pm:
In article <vfd4ot$2j5bn$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 2:19 am:
In article <xn0oses6s87gwd002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
>
In "Victory of the Daleks", the Doctor faces his old enemies
in WWII-era London. The Daleks are disguised as British war
machines, manipulating Winston Churchill's forces. The story
introduces a new, colorful Dalek paradigm, but the plot is
thin and rushed. The pacing feels uneven, with a swift
transition from war intrigue to sci-fi action.
>
While the historical setting and Daleks' reintroduction are
entertaining, the execution falls short. Overall, it's an
enjoyable but flawed episode. I'd give it a 6/10, mostly for
nostalgic value and visuals.
>
What sort of a review is that? There's no mention of Spitfires
in space, but the humpback Daleks get a mention. <shrugs>
>
And we won't even mention the trains in the sky!
>
Ooops, too late. Sorry Daniel...
>
:-)
>
Rant on! Hence why AI is what DAnnyboy says it is!
>
Oh!! And what do I say 'AI' is, Gobble-de-gook??
You know!
If *I* knew what *I* had said (in this instance), why would *I* have to ask YOU, Gobble-de-gook??
-- Daniel