Sujet : From the Archives.....
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 16. Nov 2024, 12:50:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vha0u3$f3s$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Back in December, 1994, Gobble-de-gook posted .....
*Quote*
1) I heard mention of the fact that Susan is NOT a natural person, but rather a clone. Could I have confirmation? IF true, I would start to question the canonity of the New Adventures.
*End Quote*
to which the only response was ....
*Quote*
Horse-hockey. Your source is probably confusing two sources -- "Time's Crucible", where we learn about how Time Lords are born (they're "woven on a genetic loom", whatever that means), and "Nightshade", which implies that Susan is not the Doctor's biological granddaughter.
However, both books leave it all ambiguous enough that if someone wants to, they can argue things any which way.
*End Quote*
As I understood it, Susan was half-human, half-Gualifrian, which could be correct but, if Time Lords are "woven on a genetic loom', I could accept that Susan is Half-n-half so one of her parents MUST have been "woven on a genetic loom", so The (First) Doctor *COULD NOT BE* Her Grand-Father!
Right??
--
Daniel
From the Archives.....