Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à a drwho 
Sujet : Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!
De : pursent100 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (%)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Date : 30. Jan 2025, 04:29:05
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <FqOcnY5OtKGabwf6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
The Doctor wrote:
In article <TuOcnQo7EKlhJgf6nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>,
%  <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xaudneLEM8JhMQf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
%  <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <t_idnRbjR5tLNgf6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
%  <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vne6ne$2idno$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name  <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2025-01-29 12:44:08 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall  <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$1@dont-email.me>, Your Name
<YourName@YourISP.com> writes
>
<Snip>
>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor Who (or
whatever show) posted there, then that's their problem. I don't like
90% of the shows they post about either, but they're
certainly allowed
to post about them and they are far more on topic than all the silly
political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
>
>
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
>
Well it should encompass DW!
>
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for ALL
T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup.
>
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
>
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
>
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
>
Etc., Etc., Etc..
>
It doesn't work that way though. If you go to pretty much any general
TV news website, they have posts about any show. They don't leave shows
out because there is already other Doctor Who, Star Trek, etc. specific
websites.  :-)
>
Some people just aren't interested in subscribing to hundreds separate
newsgroups when only one main one would do. Other people prefer to
subscribe to the separate ones.
>
>
>
I love variety.
>
its time for the stats
>
>
Well ...
>
well i can't do it
>
End of month comes within 72 hurs.
>
the stats won't change now
 Oh?
 
you'll win i'll be second but that means i really win so i win

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jan 25 * Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!15Your Name
27 Jan 25 `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!14John Hall
27 Jan 25  `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!13Your Name
28 Jan 25   `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!12John Hall
29 Jan 25    `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!11Daniel70
29 Jan 25     +* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!8Your Name
29 Jan 25     i`* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!7%
29 Jan 25     i +* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!5%
30 Jan 25     i i+* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!3%
30 Jan 25     i ii`* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!2%
30 Jan 25     i ii `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Daniel70
30 Jan 25     i i`- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Daniel70
30 Jan 25     i `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1%
30 Jan 25     `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!2Daniel70
30 Jan 25      `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Your Name

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal