Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à a drwho 
Sujet : Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* eternal-september.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Date : 30. Jan 2025, 11:27:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vnfk5j$2ta26$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
On 30/01/2025 12:49 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vnd7qr$2cmec$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>, John Hall
<john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$1@dont-email.me>, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> writes
 <Snip>
 
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor
Who (or whatever show) posted there, then that's their
problem. I don't like 90% of the shows they post about
either, but they're certainly allowed to post about them and
they are far more on topic than all the silly political posts
that infest rec.arts.tv
 Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
 Well it should encompass DW!
 I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for
ALL T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup.
 Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
 Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
 Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
 Etc., Etc., Etc..
 IYIO.
As I was the one who expressed that opinion, Binky, YES, it is MY
Informed Opinion!!
--
Daniel70

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jan 25 * Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!15Your Name
27 Jan 25 `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!14John Hall
27 Jan 25  `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!13Your Name
28 Jan 25   `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!12John Hall
29 Jan 25    `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!11Daniel70
29 Jan 25     +* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!8Your Name
29 Jan 25     i`* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!7%
29 Jan 25     i +* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!5%
30 Jan 25     i i+* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!3%
30 Jan 25     i ii`* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!2%
30 Jan 25     i ii `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Daniel70
30 Jan 25     i i`- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Daniel70
30 Jan 25     i `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1%
30 Jan 25     `* Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!2Daniel70
30 Jan 25      `- Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!1Your Name

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal