Sujet : Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* eternal-september.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwhoDate : 30. Jan 2025, 11:27:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vnfk5j$2ta26$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
On 30/01/2025 12:49 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vnd7qr$2cmec$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>, John Hall
<john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$1@dont-email.me>, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> writes
<Snip>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor
Who (or whatever show) posted there, then that's their
problem. I don't like 90% of the shows they post about
either, but they're certainly allowed to post about them and
they are far more on topic than all the silly political posts
that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for
ALL T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
IYIO.
As I was the one who expressed that opinion, Binky, YES, it is MY
Informed Opinion!!
-- Daniel70