Re: Mickey the idiot

On 31/01/2025 14:42, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:
>

On 30/01/2025 08:02, solar penguin wrote:

>
Actor Noel Clarke suffers blow in libel case brought against
the Guardian
>
>

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jan/29/actor-noel-clarke-suffers-blow-in-libel-case-brought-against-the-guardian >

>

>
Noel Clarke hasn't committed any crime.

>
You've seen the evidence so, you have?
>

 THERE ISN'T ANY EVIDENCE! The police weren't given anything that would even warrant and investigation.
 

Let's hope he takes down the Guardian and the rest
of the FAKE NEWS legacy media for publishing lies
they made up about him.

>
I don't know if Noel Clarke is guilty or innocent. We'll find

 He's never been investigated because or lack of evidence let alone charged.
 

out at the trial once all of the evidence is presented. But this
line from that article stood out...

 THERE ISN'T ANY EVIDENCE! Clarke is suing the Guardian for publishing a pack of complete and utter lies.
 

>
“At trial, 32 witnesses are set to testify against Mr Clarke
under oath. We look forward to a judge hearing the evidence.”
>

 Testify that he tried to chat them up? Chatting a woman up isn't a crime. Why do you think the police won't even investigate? Because there is no evidence Clarke has broken any law.
 

On the balance of probabilities it's highly unlikely that all
thirty two women are telling lies. So while I can accept there

 This isn't about Clarke's guilt or innocence. It's about the Guardian publishing a pack of downright lies against him which it has already admitted and claiming that publishing these lies which it invented, which the police said did not constitute evidence to even warrant launching and investigation were in the public interest.
 

will be a few bandwagon jumpers looking for an easy pay-out,
they can't all be wrong

 Yes they can because the Guardian made it all up. Let's hope the FAKE NEWS Guardian is found guilty and goes bust as a result.