Sujet : Re: Mickey the idiot
De : agamemnon (at) *nospam* hello.to.NO_SPAM (The True Doctor)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 02. Feb 2025, 17:59:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vno8aa$pbo5$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 02/02/2025 14:11, solar penguin wrote:
Blueshirt brilliantly brought forth:
The True Doctor wrote:
>
On 01/02/2025 13:31, Blueshirt wrote:
>
I'd still find it unlikely that all of the 32 women's stories
are made up. But even if The Guardian does lose the case, I
doubt they will go bust.
>
It is not just likely but an absolute fact as determined by
the police that all of these women made it all up since the
police did not have enough evidence against Clarke to even
warrant an investigation let alone charge him with a crime.
>
That's not how it works, not having enough evidence to prosecute
doesn't mean 'something' didn't happen.
>
If I whip my cock out in my office and shove it in a woman's
face and say "suck this if you want a job" and she runs out of
the room and goes to the police, if there's no witnesses, CCTV
footage or sound footage to back up her claims, then there will
be no evidence for a prosecution. He said, she said.
>
But I would still have done it!
Noel Clark is completely innocent of any crime. Because of
this he is taking the Guardian to court for defamation.
>
Which he might win, or he might lose... he certainly hasn't got
off to a great start anyway if that article is correct.
>
Judge AGA cannot say that Noel Clarke is completely innocent
though, just as I can't say that he's guilty, as neither of us
where there when any of these 'incidents' happened.
>
>
It’s interesting how Aggy repeatedly accuses RTD of being a
sexual predator on zero evidence, but demands proof for
the accusations against Noel Clarke.
There's plenty of evidence against RTD. It's in almost everything he makes. He's even admitted it himself when he said that he gets thrilled every time someone tells him that he discovered as a boy that he was gay after watching something Davies wrote or produced.
Double standards? Why am I not surprised?
The only double standards are those of the woke.
Why was John Barrowman cancelled for showing his cock on set on Doctor Who, which was part of his job description, when it was the pervert RTD who told him to strip naked on order to film a scene where he pulled a gun out of his arse in a children's TV programme? Why wasn't Davies cancelled as well? Why did the pervert Chris Chibnall ask Barrowman to strip naked on Torchwood? Why wasn't Chibnall also cancelled?
-- The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." -William Shatner