Sujet : Re: Mickey the idiot
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* eternal-september.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 06. Feb 2025, 11:25:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vo22nc$2thrd$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
On 6/02/2025 2:08 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p1p0rv2ck9c8000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p1nmfw1pa1j003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 03/02/2025 13:07, solar imbecile wrote:
>
I assume you aren’t seriously suggesting Barrowman’s
guilt somehow proves Clarke’s innocence as if it’s only
possible for just one companion to be played by a sex
pest!
>
But it's ok to have 3 sex pests writing for the show?
Davies, Chibnall, and Moffat who had Matt Smith baring his
arse on Doctor Who as well.
>
Alleged sex pests! I don't recall any of them being
investigated by the Police, let alone charged and/or
convicted. Isn't everyone presumed innocent?
>
Until PROVEN Guilty.
>
Yes Dave... and neither Steven Moffat, Chris Chibnall or RTD
have been found guilty of anything. That was the point!
The point is made.
Too bad YOU, Binky, can't seem to absorb it!!
-- Daniel70
Mickey the idiot
Re: Mickey the idiot