Liste des Groupes | Revenir à a drwho |
The True Doctor wrote:Explicit sexual harassment of other individuals is not entertainment. It demonstrates the disgusting toxic mindset of those running the show and the BBC to the tune of Toxic by Britney Spears. These sick, disgusting, demented individuals think that they and their elitist club of woke sex obsessed perverts are exempt from the rules and standards concerning morality that everyone else must follow.
On 29/04/2025 14:11, Blueshirt wrote:You say ideology, others might say it's just entertainment.>>
Maybe it's all AI generated?
>
Instead of Chat-GPT us lucky readers of RADW have AGA-GPT...
And still the woke degenerates refuse to answer clear
questions concerning morality, because they know their
perverted ideology which sanctions the actions of child
molesters cannot be defended.
It's a show that is supposed to be written for a family audience and having the main protagonist behave in a disgusting, provocative and sexually harassing manner towards others is completely unacceptable behaviour. This sickening behaviour encourages children to behave in a similar sexualised manner and tells them that if they do not accept the advances of a sex obsessed pervert who the show is centred around they will be systematically bullied and sexually harassed even further.Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexuallyWell Babes it's like this... you think there is a sexual element
harass other characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes'
despite being told to desist? Do you think that this kind of
behaviour is a suitable example to set to viewers? Do you
think that children should call other children 'babes'? What
do you believe that this kind of behaviour would imply?
behind everything about modern "Doctor Who". The reality is it's
very likely it's just a story and the writer writes things they
think sound fun or works within the story. It's a "Doctor Who"
script not a Gospel or a documentary.
You are free to dislike anything about any story but personallyAnd there you go proving what I said above, copying the sexual harassment that the child grooming pervert Russell T Davies inserted into the show. Just imagine what could happen to a child that calls someone else "babes", words that deviant, child grooming, perverts want to put into their mouths.
Babes I think you read too much in to everything. Maybe make a
cup of tea for yourself and go for a lay down on the couch...
Sexual harassment is not humerus, especially when it is directed at children. It sets a bad role model and encourages toxic behaviour when it comes from the man protagonist and irrespective from whom it comes from is not immediately put down and the character which uses it is not completely castigated and humiliated for such behaviour.Do you deny that the lead character suggested that hisNo, I think it constitutes what the writer considers humour...
companion's mum should be allowed to whistle up his behind?
The direct quote from the episodes is "and your mum can
whistle up my behind". This can easily be found in the iPlayer
recording so anyone can check and confirm it?
>
Do you not believe that this also constitutes sexual
harassment of the companion and their mother?
not my kind of humour mind you, as it wouldn't be a phrase we'dIf you used such a phrase over 'here' you'd probably be arse raped within seconds.
use here. But I don't see it as anything to get worked up over.
If "Doctor Who" bothers you THAT much, switch it off.Doctor Who ended in 2017!
Here you go again sexually harassing people. What did I say about children copying this kind of disgusting behaviour?Do you think that this kind of disgusting behaviour should beWell Babes, you claim nobody is watching "Doctor Who" so who can
portrayed on television, especially in a family TV show
directed at children?
get harmed by it?
The only people watching "Doctor Who" are the ones that haveThat is not a justification for the inclusion of sexual harassment in anything.
BBC1 on while they do other things around the house, so if that
is the case it doesn't matter what is in the script!
This wasn't using the term 'babes' behind closed doors. The term was being used in public and without people's explicit consent. The sex obsessed pervert Ncuti Gatwa was told to stop using it and sexually harassing others and instead of desisting he started bulling those that asked him to stop and harassed them even further. He couldn't be written as being more toxic, and the deranged child grooming pervert of a writer knew it was toxic because had this debauchery performed to the tune of Toxic by Britney Spears.Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to callNo Babes. Although maybe my son calls his girlfriend "Babes"
others 'babes'?
behind closed doors? Maybe my son-in-law uses the term too? Who
knows? I don't ask as I don't care. There are a lot worse words
out there!
It's not the show that's sexually abusing children it's the perverts who are in it such as Huw Edwards and others watching it. This is the example that these depraved writers like Russell T Davies set for others to follow.Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to suggestStop with the child abuse shit. I know people who have been
to others that they should whistle up or even at their behinds?
>
What do you think that engaging in such behaviour would result
in, especially if a female child carried it out towards an
adult male?
>
Do you think that this kind of behaviour even by an adult,
behaviour which amounts to sexual harassment, and child abuse,
is acceptable?
fucking abused when they were young... and it wasn't by a
fictional TV show that they could avoid by switching it off!
So you think a child grooming pervert should keep his job because he might work on another show instead? Being sacked means you will never be employed in the industry ever again.Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote thisNo they shouldn't be sacked. They might end up working on the
disgusting dialogue and encouraged this kind of disgusting
behaviour should keep their jobs? Do you not think that they
should be sacked? If not why not?
next lot of BBC Agatha Christie adaptations... and we
wouldn't want that now Babes, would we?
Your truth, the truth of the woke is acting as an apologist for the indefensible.If you didn't answer each question with the truth then you'veYou want the truth? You can't handle the truth!!!
lost the argument.
But if you continue to watch "Doctor Who" every week then youDoctor Who ended in 2017! I've not seen a single new episode of the show since then.
get what you deserve.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.