Re: Why DW never had a villain called Thorncock?

Sujet : Re: Why DW never had a villain called Thorncock?
De : pursent100 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (%)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho
Date : 06. Jun 2025, 14:58:56

Autres entêtes

Message-ID : <mLadneNuBt2Had_1nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20

Nomen Nescio wrote:

Sounds like a rather British name.

so does neal warren

Date	Sujet	#	Auteur
6 Jun12:05	Why DW never had a villain called Thorncock?	3	Nomen Nescio
6 Jun14:58	Re: Why DW never had a villain called Thorncock?	1	%
7 Jun05:50	Re: Why DW never had a villain called Thorncock?	1	The True Doctor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal