Sujet : Re: Fans ARE FURIOUS At Billie Piper As Doctor Who Revelation From BBC
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* eternal-september.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwhoDate : 07. Jun 2025, 13:28:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1021b98$31ik9$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
On 7/06/2025 12:17 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <e721fd0baee252ccdb1e821fee3f99f8@www.novabbs.com>,
Theory11 <card.master@bee92.invalid.com> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:36:06 +0000, Ubiquitous wrote:
In article <xn0p6outf79jm86001@post.eweka.nl>, blueshirt@indigo.news
wrote:
Ubiquitous wrote:
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
>
Hopefully Rose is a placeholder.
>
From what I heard, it was a stunt to convince Disney to pay
for another season ("Look at the ratings! People want to see
another season!").
>
Well... if the alternative is "Doctor Who" being cancelled, I
want to see another season, regardless of the ratings.
>
I'd rather have no Doctor Who than bad Doctor Who.
>
The simplest alternative is to avoid watching a television program that
has deteriorated in quality to the stage where it is deemed "bad" by
parts of its fandom.
parts? More like a large part.
Is "a large part" not "a part"??
-- Daniel70
Fans ARE FURIOUS At Billie Piper As Doctor Who Revelation From BBC
Re: Fans ARE FURIOUS At Billie Piper As Doctor Who Revelation From BBC
