Sujet : Re: Semi-OT: Sex roles in life, religion - and celebs De : lenona321 (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Lenona) Groupes :rec.arts.movies.current-films Date : 09. Jul 2024, 20:44:44 Autres entêtes Organisation : Rocksolid Light Message-ID :<bac36a1b06b615ebbaa731dd3779881f@www.novabbs.org> References :1 User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Also: The authors of the book NEVER discuss the elephant in the room. Namely, even if every woman in the world wanted to be a housewife, that wouldn't change the fact that not every woman is "marriageable"; accidents and diseases happen, so a wife has to be prepared to be the SOLE breadwinner at a moment's notice; death and divorce happen too. Yes, it's too bad the role of the housewife got such a bad rap in the 1970s and afterward, since that didn't encourage boys to hate housework any less, but something drastic clearly had to be done to get girls born to conservative parents to think twice before throwing away their educations. Also: "No way! We want someone who is hook, line, and sinker in love with us and wants to make our relationship the most important earthly love they ever pursue." Funny. While romantic love as a basis for marriage has been in vogue for more than five centuries, up until the 1960s or so, it was considered perfectly normal for MARRIED men to put their careers first - even to the point of staying away from home 80 hours a week. After all, they were just supporting their families and avoiding making messes at home for their wives to clean up, right? When did people like the authors suddenly decide that wasn't good enough?
Date
Sujet
#
Auteur
9 Jul 24
Re: Semi-OT: Sex roles in life, religion - and celebs