Sujet : Re: When Roger Ebert was mean
De : plutedpup (at) *nospam* outlook.com (Pluted Pup)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv rec.arts.movies.past-filmsDate : 30. Sep 2024, 00:54:59
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <0001HW.2CAA205301D2BAC330E8A538F@news.giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Hogwasher/5.24
On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 17:45:32 -0700, Arthur Lipscomb wrote:
On 9/28/2024 2:34 PM, Pluted Pup wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 18:04:41 -0700, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>
7 of Roger Ebert's Most Brutal Movie Reviews
https://time.com/2957019/roger-ebert-life-itself-brutal-reviews/
>
North (1994) has some good gags in it, that's better than a lot of
Ebert's choices.
>
I thought I was the only one who liked North. I remember them raging
against it on their show. Then I saw it and it was OK. I haven't
watched it since the original release, but I'd definitely be interested
in watching it again.
Ebert "ironically" endorsed North (1994), I saw it once,
recently, based on his review.