Re: I Met A Girl / Will Dockery

On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 17:25:39 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 17:01:28 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
>

On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 16:54:30 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
>

On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 16:49:22 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
>

On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 14:27:25 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
>

On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 14:08:38 +0000, Will-Dockery wrote:
>

Zod wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 9:40:55 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:

I Met A Girl
>
I met a girl

>
By Will Donkey
>

She was a little freckled girl
from out of
my high school past.
At this point I kissed her
and put my finger to her hole.

>
Edited for effect.
>
Real piece of work, that Donkey.
>
--

>
Well I've wondered if I should censor that link for many years and in
the end decided to keep it as I'd written it 43 years ago.
>
I think, in fact, you've already flamed me about this.

>
I have, and shall continue to whenever I stumble across it.
>
A poem about fingering a high school girl, is reprehensible regardless
of whether you set it in a dream.

She wasn't in high school, she was from my high school past.
The year was 1982, five years after my time at Carver High School.

You missed the context, the girl wasn't in high school when the actual
you described happened.
>
She was "out of my high school past" almost a decade before the poem was
written which would make us both in our twenties on May 8 1982.

>
You don't understand how to express yourself clearly

In your opinion.
The details are easily understood.

When yoy say that someone is "from out of my high school past," the
implication is that she stepped out of the past.  When someone steps out
of your past, they are at the same age they had been in the year that
they stepped out of.

No, she was a person I know in high school who reappeared in 1982, five
years after High school.

You should have said that you dreamed you met someone from your past.

The poem states:
"It was in a dream, we knew each other instantly."

But even if she was in her twenties in your dream, your poem is still
offensive to the nth degree.

It was explicit, agreed.

It is demeaning to women, objectifying
them as nothing more than a "hole" to stick your finger (or your willie)

No, that's not true, it was just some sex.
Grown ups in 1982 had sex, fucked, all that sort of thing.

in.  It further implies that you find nothing wrong with groping, and
digitally penetrating, a woman you've just met.

We'd known each other about a decade at that time.

The fact that you would post this in your 60s, only shows how
insensitive and misogynistic you've remained over the years.

The poem was written on May 8th 1982 and probably isn't something I'd
write in 2025.

Truly disgusting.
>
--

Sorry you're so sensitive, but that's also why I've tried rewrites over
the years but just finally decided to settle on leaving it in the
"Erotic poetry" genre.
HTH and HAND.