Liste des Groupes | Revenir à a poems |
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:03:02 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
>
Absolutely.If the line had been copied from Creeley with only minor modifications
(as George Dance falsely claims), posting it without crediting him
*would* be plagiarism.
>George Dance, you have a distorted view of what plagiarism is. Since
No, Lying Michael. Copying one line of someone else's poem to use in a
poem of one's own is not plagiarism. It may be considered rude, if done
to a living author, but it is not considered literary theft.
>We have several times recognized (and called) plagiarism on George DanceIt doesn't matter whether NancyGene would call it "plagiarism" if
someone else did it. It would be an act of plagiarism regardless of
what NancyGene, or anyone else, called it.
>According to George Dance, the English Department at the University of
No, Lying Michael: it's something that only a troll would call
plagiarism: a troll like NastyGoon, or ... yourself.
>What other interpretation could a person make other than that GeorgeAnd since George Dance titled the thread this accusation appeared in
"NastyGoon lifts a line" (FYI: That is a direct accusation that
NancyGene copied the line from Creeley), he's calling her a
plagiarist... twice.
>The question is why you, George Dance, don't recognize that you are
No, HarryLiar. As Will said, you got the line wrong. The only question
is why.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.