Re: A bottomless pit of plagiarism

Liste des GroupesRevenir à as fandom 
Sujet : Re: A bottomless pit of plagiarism
De : petertrei (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Cryptoengineer)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.fandom
Date : 17. Jun 2025, 19:19:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102sbjh$2hpuu$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/16/2025 5:58 AM, Gary McGath wrote:
On 6/15/25 4:17 PM, Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
 
>
[Hal Heydt]
Alternatively, if the story wasn't originally copyrighted in the
US, the US may not have recognized the validity of the copyright.
See, for instance, the reason for the premier of the G&S oparetta
_The Pirates of Penzance_.
 Gilbert and Sullivan solved that problem, after losing a lot of potential royalties, by filing for copyright in the US. To do this, they had to put on a US production of the operas they wanted to protect.
 Tangentially related, but I just happen to have posted a blog article on it this morning, which I wrote a few days ago: For most of the 18th century, printed music was considered uncopyrightable in Great Britain. Johann Christian Bach, the son of Johann Sebastian Bach who had moved to London, filed a lawsuit against a publisher that established in 1777 that it was copyrightable.
 https://garymcgath.com/wp/when-music-became-copyrightable/
What other creative categories have no IP protection?
IIRC, neither clothing styles nor culinary recipes have any
protection. You can knock off the shape and material of a
Louis Vuitton handbag, but you'll be in trouble if you include
the 'LV' pattern, which is a trademark.
pt

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal