Sujet : Re: A New Solution to the Fermi Paradox
De : usenet (at) *nospam* mikevanpelt.com (Mike Van Pelt)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 16. Mar 2025, 04:26:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vr5gcl$roui$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
slrnvse8ls.s38.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>,
Christian Weisgerber <
naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:
If you move from A to B in less time than light takes to travel
that distance, it's FTL. Doesn't matter _how_.
Also, if you can move from A to B in less time than light takes
to travel that distance, then accelerate towards A, then travel
from B to A in less time than light takes, it doesn't matter how,
you have traveled into the past.
When that was finally explained to me in a way that I understood
*why*, it was a major "ARGH!" moment. I want my FTL. But I don't
believe in time travel into the past.
-- Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out HurricaneKE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston