Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper

Liste des GroupesRevenir à as written 
Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper
De : bliss-sf4ever (at) *nospam* dslextreme.com (Bobbie Sellers)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 24. Jun 2025, 18:42:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : dis
Message-ID : <103eo1q$22rni$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/23/25 01:39, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2025 16:50:56 -0000 (UTC), jdnicoll@panix.com (James
Nicoll) wrote:
 
That's not even getting into how Quebec would react as French gets
bumped down from second language to third, after Spanish.
 Which practically speaking is why the proposition is so absurd.
 BC and AB combined have a considerably larger population than Quebec
yet considerably fewer seats in Parliament AND the constitutional
amending formula prevents any constitutional amendments that Quebec or
the Maritime provinces object to no matter how lopsided the population
gets. Can't remember whether it was the premier of NS or NB who said
something to the effect of "the present amending formula works quite
well for us - why would we consent to change it?'
 Thus BC and AB are under represented in BOTH houses of Parliament and
the amending formula prevents any changes - forever. Is it any wonder
why people in BC and AB feel like second class citizens in their own
country?
 Now all Canadian provinces (except PEI) have a larger population than
the smallest US state but only ON, QC, BC, AB have more than 4 million
people which by US state standards is small.
 Bottom line is if Donald Trump made his "51st state joke" once and
never repeated it Canadians would have forgotten it by now - but he
didn't and in so doing drove US-Canada relations to the lowest point
in 50+ years.
 The hell of it is that in 2024, Trump really WAS a better candidate
than Harris (much less Biden given his mental state in 2024) which
says more about Harris than Trump.
That is just your opinion but with the Election of Trump she correctly
predicted War in 6 months.

 It's not the first time a political leader has been less than
completely 'compos mentis' - and Winston Churchill (even though in his
prime was a much better Prime Minister than Biden ever was as
President) at the end of his last term of office was in much worse
shape than Biden.
Churchill apparently had some form of bipolar condition but as
long as he had a War to manage he shoved aside his depression and
worked very hard to keep the UK free of Germany.

As for Biden's mental state he was ill at the debate and maybe
needed more rest as the Presidency is a stressful job and old folks
do not recover as fast.
Trump's rise to a second term was engineered as were his Supreme
Court choices.

bliss -who recognized a fascist candidate whenever Trump opened his mouth.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Feb 25 * (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper72James Nicoll
25 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper67Charles Packer
19 Apr 25 i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper66Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
20 Apr 25 i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper61Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Scott Dorsey
20 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Lynn McGuire
20 Apr 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
21 Apr 25 i ii+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
21 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper9Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper8Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7Dimensional Traveler
28 May 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5William Hyde
28 May 25 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Cryptoengineer
28 May 25 i ii  i +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
24 Jun 25 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Cryptoengineer
24 Jun 25 i ii  i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
23 Jun 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
20 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper40Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper39Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper38James Nicoll
29 May 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper26Paul S Person
29 May 25 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper25Lynn McGuire
30 May 25 i ii  i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper21Dimensional Traveler
30 May 25 i ii  i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper18Scott Dorsey
30 May 25 i ii  i ii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i iii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Scott Dorsey
31 May 25 i ii  i iii `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i ii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper13Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii  i iii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
31 May 25 i ii  i iiii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii  i iiii `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
23 Jun 25 i ii  i iii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper9Paul S Person
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper8Cryptoengineer
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7Titus G
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Dimensional Traveler
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
25 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
25 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
3 Jun 25 i ii  i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Titus G
23 Jun 25 i ii  i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
23 Jun 25 i ii  i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
30 May 25 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i  +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
30 May 25 i ii  i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
23 Jun 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7Paul S Person
18 Jul22:09 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper6William Hyde
20 Jul01:44 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5Scott Dorsey
21 Jul21:19 i ii  i  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4William Hyde
22 Jul01:49 i ii  i   +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Scott Dorsey
22 Jul19:39 i ii  i   i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Christian Weisgerber
23 Jul00:05 i ii  i   `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Lynn McGuire
23 Jun 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
18 Jul23:00 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2William Hyde
21 Jul21:24 i ii  i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
24 Jun 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
19 May 25 i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
19 May 25 i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
28 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2quadibloc
3 Mar 25 i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1WolfFan
28 Feb 25 +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Lynn McGuire
19 May 25 `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal