Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper

Liste des GroupesRevenir à as written 
Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper
De : petertrei (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Cryptoengineer)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 23. Jul 2025, 22:24:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <105rjue$13r09$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/22/2025 7:05 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 7/21/2025 9:57 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:19:59 -0400, William Hyde
<wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Scott Dorsey wrote:
William Hyde  <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
Irrelevant.  Randolph was sick, possibly but not certainly from
syphilis.  Nothing heritable, at any rate.
>
But syphilis -is- heritable, and frequently was inherited in the 19th
century and the early part of the 20th before Dr. Ehrlich's cure.
--scott
>
As I understand it, the victim is contagious for a few years, but then,
though still infected, he no longer spreads the disease. So if Randolph
caught it - and it is far from clear that he did - it must have been
well before his marriage.
>
Many US states used to require blood tests before issuing a marriage
licence and in most jurisdictions the stated reason was to ensure
sexually transmitted diseases weren't present at a marriage.
>
This has been waived in most jurisdictions in the last 50 years. (At
least I didn't have to do one though for my own benefit did a medical
checkup late in our engagement)
 Blood tests were required in Texas when my wife and I got married 43 years ago in 1982.
It was required in MA as recently as 1989, from personal experience.
My browser's AI claims no states require it now, with Montana being the
last to drop it in 2019.
pt

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Feb 25 * (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper74James Nicoll
25 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper69Charles Packer
19 Apr 25 i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper68Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
20 Apr 25 i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper63Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Scott Dorsey
20 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Lynn McGuire
20 Apr 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
21 Apr 25 i ii+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
21 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper9Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper8Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7Dimensional Traveler
28 May 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5William Hyde
28 May 25 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Cryptoengineer
28 May 25 i ii  i +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
24 Jun 25 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Cryptoengineer
24 Jun 25 i ii  i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
23 Jun 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
20 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper42Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper41Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper40James Nicoll
29 May 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper27Paul S Person
29 May 25 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper26Lynn McGuire
30 May 25 i ii  i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper22Dimensional Traveler
30 May 25 i ii  i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper19Scott Dorsey
30 May 25 i ii  i ii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i iii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Scott Dorsey
31 May 25 i ii  i iii `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i ii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper14Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii  i iii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
31 May 25 i ii  i iiii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii  i iiii `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
23 Jun 25 i ii  i iii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper10Paul S Person
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper8Cryptoengineer
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7Titus G
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Dimensional Traveler
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
25 Jun 25 i ii  i iii i i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
25 Jun 25 i ii  i iii i i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii i +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
23 Jul22:43 i ii  i iii `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Lynn McGuire
3 Jun 25 i ii  i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Titus G
23 Jun 25 i ii  i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
23 Jun 25 i ii  i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
30 May 25 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i  +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
30 May 25 i ii  i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
23 Jun 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper8Paul S Person
18 Jul22:09 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7William Hyde
20 Jul01:44 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper6Scott Dorsey
21 Jul21:19 i ii  i  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5William Hyde
22 Jul01:49 i ii  i   +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Scott Dorsey
22 Jul19:39 i ii  i   i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Christian Weisgerber
23 Jul00:05 i ii  i   `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Lynn McGuire
23 Jul22:24 i ii  i    `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Cryptoengineer
23 Jun 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
18 Jul23:00 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2William Hyde
21 Jul21:24 i ii  i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
24 Jun 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
19 May 25 i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
19 May 25 i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
28 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2quadibloc
3 Mar 25 i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1WolfFan
28 Feb 25 +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Lynn McGuire
19 May 25 `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal