Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect.

On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 12:06:05 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:

On 12/26/2024 10:17 AM, NoBody wrote:

On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 12:31:38 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
 

On 12/25/2024 11:26 AM, NoBody wrote:

On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:51:18 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>

On 12/24/2024 7:37 AM, NoBody wrote:

On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:48:57 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>

On 12/23/2024 7:25 AM, NoBody wrote:

On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 13:23:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>

On 12/22/2024 10:27 AM, NoBody wrote:

On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:43:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>

On 12/21/2024 10:19 AM, NoBody wrote:

On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:12:54 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>

On 12/20/2024 7:04 AM, NoBody wrote:

On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:42:58 -0500, shawn
<nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>

On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:53:45 -0500, EGK <memyself@null.net> wrote:
>

On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:31:32 -0500, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:31:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>

BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:

suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:

On 12/18/2024 4:28 AM, NoBody wrote:

On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:19 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>

. . .

>

Your President-elect forcibly finger fucked her.  Explain *that* fact.

>

Trump was not convicted of rape.  ABC said he was.  They lied.

>

End of story.

>

In other jurisdictions it's considered rape/

>

But he wasn't in other jurisdictions.

>
The harm to Donald Trump wws nominal. not $15 million worth.

>
ABC obviously felt otherwise given that they caved so quickly.

>
They didnt want to go through discovery and be exposed as the biased
organization most of the media is.  ABC producers warned Stephanopolous not
to use the term "rape" and he just thumbed his nose at them and did it
repeatedly anyway.
https://nypost.com/2024/12/18/media/abc-parent-disney-didnt-think-it-would-beat-trump-in-court-report/

>
He could still likely have gotten away with it if he had said
something like "I think he's guilty of rape" while still giving the
official legal facts.

>
Let's not forget he was verbally attacking a rape victim during the
interview.  Way to go Boy George.

>
No, he was verbally (albeit indirectly) attacking a rapist.
>

>
Did you see the interview?  He was extremely aggressive towards her.
Disgraceful behavior.

>
I agree.  He was extremely aggressive towards her disgraceful behavior.
>

>
What disgraceful bbehavior did she exhibit?

>
She stonewalled his question by chanting a baseless accusation.
>

>
What "baseless accusation"?
You have this completely backwards.

>
Well, "backwards" is certainly what she was going for.  She tried to
turn his question ("How can a rapee support a rapist?") into shaming
raped women for their "political choices".  I can't even begin...
>

Look at you blaming the (literal) victim.
You're pathetic.

>
Yes, you parrot her faithfully.
>

Your evasion is noted and is your admission that you've lost the
discussion.

>
If I had nickel for every self-declared "victor"...
>

 
You make a claim and are completely unable to either defend it or have
a reasonable explanation for your position.  This is the very
definition of "loss".  You did it to yourself.
 
Deal with it.

>
Okay... what did I blame on a "literal victim"?  What did George?  Think
carefully, now...
>

Perhaps you need to review the video of the interview before
commenting further.  Agressively interviewing a rape victim using a
false claim as the basis of the discussion is "blaming the victim".

Think carefully, now...