Sujet : Re: The Schwartz Awakens
De : dtravel (at) *nospam* sonic.net (Dimensional Traveler)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 13. Jun 2025, 15:01:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102havh$3fe8v$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/13/2025 12:31 AM, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-06-12 23:38:10 +0000, shawn said:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 11:13:03 +1200, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
wrote:
On 2025-06-12 22:32:27 +0000, shawn said:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:16:00 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
>
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1933196231150641152/vid/ avc1/1920x1080/GIhXgpCvs1JPNj6w.mp4
>
Glad to see it. I figured it would never happen given his age.
>
Given Mel Brooks is 92, it may still never happen.
>
I had that thought but they can still make the move even if Brooks
passes away before the movie is finished.
That would depend on whether whoever takes over sticks to the original Brooks' version or tries to make changes with their own silly ideas.
Not that I care since I found the first movie silly nonsense anyway. :-)
Which is exactly what it was supposed to be.
-- I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.
The Schwartz Awakens
Re: The Schwartz Awakens