Re: MSNBC Contributor Suggests Kamala Harris Might Replace Obama As Most Influential

In article <va78rr$dlh9$4@dont-email.me>,
 Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

An MSNBC contributor said at the Democratic National Convention on Tuesday
that Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris may replace
former President Barack Obama as the most influential black politician in
the party.

Remember: three months ago she was a drag on the ticket and the Biden
people were speculating on the pros and cons of replacing "the most
unpopular politician" in the last 20 years with someone else.

Now she walks on water and heals the sick with a touch.

"Well, first of all, Michelle Obama is stratospheric. She is an icon.
She is authentic," Ryan said.

Yes, she's authentically racist. See my other thread for details.

"When you talk about someone reaching someone, she is Chicago, born and
bred, South Side. You can't get more authentic than that. When she speaks,
she speaks to the heart. So let's go there, and people believe her and
feel her. But when you have two people-- beyond Reverend Al Sharpton,
who I'm sitting right next to-- who are some of the greatest orators of
our time

Sharpton is also one of the sleaziest con men, race hustlers, and
grifters of our time.

"This moment is even larger than when Barack Obama became president," she
claimed. "I remember the night that he was elected, and I happened to be
at the White House... and I'll never forget all the kids who ran to the
White House and just a spontaneous crowd, because they saw change.

What are we 'changing' from this time? Kammie is already *in* office.
She's had three years to do something. Anything. And the only thing she
managed to do is fail at the one thing she was assigned: the border.

How do you spend three years creating the very problems you're now
saying you'll tackle and solve "on Day One" and not expect people to
answer, why not tackle and solve them on Day Now? Or Day Yesterday?