Sujet : Re: Jewish Journalist Arrested for Objecting to Islamic Terror Symbol in Grocery Store
De : atropos (at) *nospam* mac.com (BTR1701)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 07. Mar 2025, 21:16:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vqfk6l$3n6mi$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS
On Mar 7, 2025 at 12:04:04 PM PST, "moviePig" <
nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/6/2025 2:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
https://rairfoundation.com/jewish-journalist-sloan-rachmuth-arrested-objecting-islamic-terror/
...
Arrested for 'cyberstalking', not "objecting".
Which is much a bullshit charge as objecting, as was explained in the original
post**, and why the district attorney immediately shit-canned the case because
she knew the arrest both failed to meet the elements of the crime charged and
flagrantly violated the 1st Amendment.
**North Carolina's cyberstalking statute, G.S. 14-196.3, requires repeated
electronic communications made to a person with the intent to "annoy,
threaten, or harass" an individual.
--Rachmuth made a single post (no repetition as the statute requires).
--Rachmuth's post was not directed *at* the employee as the statute requires.
It was *about* the employee but not sent *to* the employee in any way.
Furthermore, State v. Bishop (2016) and State v. Shackelford (2019) have
reinforced the principle that vague and overly-broad interpretations of
cyber-stalking statutes violate constitutional protections of free speech and
press freedom.